Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Marquis Who's Who America's Biographer since 1899
American Association for Justice
The Chicago Bar Association
Illinois Trial Lawyers Association
Illinois State Bar Association

Medical Malpractice Birth Injury Verdict Of $4.1 Million Affirmed On Appeal

April 11, 2012

A Maryland court of appeals recently affirmed a $4.1 million dollar medical malpractice verdict involving an alleged birth injury that resulted in brain damage to a baby boy. Assuming there is no additional appeal, the money will be used to provide for the child's basic needs over his lifetime. The medical malpractice lawyers who argued this case are to be commended, as they overcame a significant obstacle to winning the case based on the baby's underlying premature birth.

The child's mother was admitted to the University of Maryland Hospital while just 26 weeks along in her pregnancy. According to the family's medical malpractice lawyers, doctors should have performed an emergency cesarean after based, in part, on the mother had an infection. This was not done. As a result, they argue the baby suffered hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy or HIE--at type of oxygen deprivation. In doing so, the lawyers for the family convinced the jury that part, if not all, of the child's brain damage occurred as a result of oxygen deprivation from a delayed delivery rather than preexisting damage from prematurity.

Failure to perform an emergency c-section is a common allegation made by medical malpractice lawyers in birth injury cases involving brain damage. The Plaintiff's typically argue the baby was experiencing fetal distress which required immediate delivery to avoid brain damage. In contrast, the defense routinely argues that they were not negligent in delaying delivery and, in either event, the baby's neurologic problems were preexisting.

In the recent Maryland case, the medical malpractice defense lawyers argued their doctors and hospital were not negligent in anyway and that the baby's brain damaged was caused by his prematurity at 26 weeks gestation--that is, it preexisted labor and delivery. Ultimately, the jury disagreed and found against the defense. After the defense appealed. The appellate court ultimately affirmed the jury's verdict in favor of the boy.

Sources Used:, Baltimore City Birth Injury Verdict Affirmed, February 17, 2012.

Client Reviews
Thorough, articulate, and extremely knowledgeable of the law. Jason is someone I would highly recommend to family and friends. He represented me in an automobile case and was very happy with the overall experience and outcome! Joni S.
Jason handled a very challenging auto accident case for me. My injuries were all based on preexisting conditions that were made worse by the accident. He did an amazing job proving up my case, which included destroying the defense expert at deposition. In the end, I received an excellent settlement on a tough case. Jason is a very smart, talented, and diligent lawyer who I would highly recommend to anyone. Phil S.